Court dismisses corruption allegations against Oronsaye


An FCT high court, Maitama, on Tuesday discharged Steve Oronsaye, former head of the civil service of the federation, of the N190 million corruption charges levelled against him.

Oronsaye was also the chairman of the Presidential Committee on Financial Action Task Force, set up by former President Goodluck Jonathan.

He was arraigned on a seven-count charge, bordering on breach of trust and diversion of N190 million meant for the committee he chaired.

In her ruling, Olasumbo Goodluck, the judge said the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against Oronsaye.

“There was contradictory evidence by the prosecution witnesses on whether the defendant was still the head of service as at the time he chaired the committee,” she said.

“The court seems to discredit the evidence, suffice it to say that there is no evidence linking the accused with the statutory element and ingredients of the offence with which he is charged.

“The court of trial must as a matter of law discharge him because it has no business scouting for evidence that is nowhere to be found.

“I have looked through the case and I am unable to see any justifications for this case. The defendant is hereby discharged.”

On November 15, the prosecution closed its case on after calling six witnesses to testify.

On December 9, the defence filed no-case submission, on the ground that the prosecution had no case against the defendant.

In his submission, Kanu Agabi the defence counsel, argued that there were omissions of essential elements in the charges against his client.

He said on that account the charges were imperfect.

Agabi said that the charge was initially two- count later amended to seven-count.

He said that, that was a sign that something was wrong with the charge from the beginning.

Responding, the prosecuting counsel, Offem Uket, told the court that the prosecution had proved its case, adding that the defendant should enter his defence.

Uket said it was not right to bring up the issue of imperfection of charges now, as it was against the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, (ACJA) 2015.

He urged the court to dismiss the no- case submission.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.