Onnoghen’s suspension legally, morally right – Sagay


Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), has said President Muhammadu Buhari only obeyed a court order in suspending Chief Justice Walter Onnoghen.

He said the President’s action was in line with the rule of law as there was a valid order, which he obeyed. Sagay that Chief Justice Onnoghen’s removal was also morally justified as he had admitted that he did not fully comply with the assets declaration requirements.

He agreed that the Constitution empowers the President to remove the CJN through the Senate.

However, he argued that the president could also suspend the CJN pending when the Senate votes on whether the CJN should be removed or not, According to him, the CJN could return to his post if the Senate does not remove him by a two-thirds majority.

“The suspension is morally justified and legally justified. Morally, he should not be in that office considering what has happened. Legally, the President has powers to remove him.

“The Code of Conduct Tribunal gave an order that the CJN should be removed from office. So, the President carried out a court order. “If anyone says it’s an exparte application, my answer is that all the orders they got from courts over the matter were ex-parte.

“If they have been using ex-parte, they have no moral right to quarrel if the prosecution applies the same method in one case as against four in their own case.

“So, the President was obeying a court order and for the rule of law to prevail, he should obey court orders. That’s number one. “Two, without even going to court, Section 292 (1) of the Constitution provides for the CJN’s removal, including over a breach of the Code of Conduct. He has committed a breach of the Code of Conduct and he has admitted it.

“The only person who can remove the CJN in the Constitution is the President. The removal could take the form of presentation of the matter before the Senate by the President. “The Senate cannot bring the matter before themselves, nor can the National Judicial Council.

So, the President, in trying to exercise the power of removal of the Chief Justice for breach of Code of Conduct, can first suspend him. Hide original message

“He can then take his name to the Senate for consideration for permanent removal. If the case fails and the Senate cannot vote by two-thirds majority, then the CJN returns to his post.

This is my own interpretation. “But the government has adopted the alternative option of obeying a clear court order which accords with the rule of law.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.