A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday heard that a former Chief of Air Staff, Mohammed Umar, had commenced an out-of-court settlement negotiation in the money laundering charge against him.
Umar is being tried on a seven-count charge of laundering N4.8 billion, while he was Chief of Air Staff.
He had pleaded not guilty and was granted bail by Justice Binta Nyako on self-recognition.
At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Umar’s Counsel, Hassan Liman, informed the court of moves by his client to have the matter settled out of court.
Liman said his client held meetings with officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), stating that the first meeting, involving the head of the legal department of the commission, the prosecuting counsel and Umar, was held on May 31 while another meeting was held on June 3.
He said that in attendance at both meetings which has a member of the EFCC’s task force, Ibrahim Musa, and the prosecution counsel, Sylvanus Tahir, resolved that the defendant should send a formal communication to the commission.
Liman further disclosed that a formal letter addressed to the Chairman of the EFCC, Ibrahim Magu, dated June 6, had already been dispatched.
Confirming the development, the prosecuting counsel said he was aware that the defendant wrote to the chairman of the commission seeking to engage the Federal Government in a discussion over the charge.
“I also confirm that there were meetings between the defendant and the commission where I was also in attendance,” Tahir said.
When the matter was called, the prosecuting counsel said they were ready for the trial, but Liman said that it would be prejudicial to commence trial in view of the ongoing attempt to settle out of court.
He urged the court to grant an adjournment to enable them proceed with the out-of-court settlement in spite of the fact that the matter had been set down for trial.
The prosecuting counsel, however, insisted that the out-of-court settlement was not a ground to stop trial since it was not a civil matter and urged the court to order the commencement of trial.
Justice Nyako, however, held that trial could not commence since the condition precedent for trial had not been met by the defence.
Justice Nyako said the defence ought to have filed a summary of defence for the trial to commence and adjourned the matter till June 16 for commencement of trial.
Follow Us