The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has criticised the federal government’s bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, allowing English lawyers to practise in Nigeria.
On Tuesday, Nigeria and the UK formalised a new trade agreement to boost trade and investment between both countries.
Called the Enhanced Trade and Investment Partnership (ETIP), the agreement is also expected to unlock new opportunities for UK and Nigerian businesses.
The aspect of the agreement that bothers the NBA is that it will commit Nigeria to work towards allowing UK lawyers to practise in Nigeria without any hindrance.
Many Nigerian lawyers fear that it will considerably increase the import of legal services to Nigeria, to their disadvantage.
Why we oppose the agreement?
The NBA said the agreement puts Nigeria at a disadvantage, threatening to resist it by all means necessary within the ambit of the law.
“We want to make it very clear that the ETIP agreement, in so far as it relates to legal services, is unacceptable in its entirety. The NBA will take all necessary measures provided by our laws in support of our position on this matter,” the NBA president, Yakubu Maikyau, said in a statement on Wednesday.
He said the agreement “will compromise our legal space.”
Describing the deal as a “tragic reminder of our colonial past,” Maikyau wondered why the Nigerian government would take such a decision with a likely monumental impact without consulting with the NBA.
“It is indeed unfortunate that this tragic reminder of our colonial past is being gleefully celebrated at the highest level of the government of Nigeria. What is more disheartening is the fact that a decision of this magnitude that adversely affects the well-being and livelihood of millions of Nigerians, could be taken without any consultation, especially with the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).
“For the avoidance of doubt, the NBA had no foreknowledge or inclination of the text of the said agreement. We could not, therefore, have contributed to it. Since assuming office as President of the NBA, I have clearly opposed any agreement that will compromise our legal space. At all the meetings.”
Maikyau, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), posited that a provision of the agreement allowing lawyers from the UK to ply their trade in Nigeria is reminiscent of “our colonial past.”
He explained that Nigerian lawyers do not possess the requisite skills to match their British counterparts, even if the UK were to reciprocate the gesture to Nigeria.
Nigeria undermining its legal professionals
Drawing comparisons between the two countries, Maikyau said the British government would not undermine its own body of legal professionals in such a manner as the Nigerian government has done.
“It is truly tragic that while the government of the UK is seeking opportunities for its own lawyers beyond its constrained environment, the government of Nigeria is attempting to deprive Nigerian lawyers and their millions of dependants of means of livelihood.
“To embark on such a venture without recourse to the NBA is the height of insensitivity to the plight of the legal profession in Nigeria, and this is totally unacceptable,” the statement added.
Recalling his previous interactions with the Law Society of England & Wales and the Bar Council of England & Wales, the NBA president said he registered the association’s “opposition to a bilateral agreement between the Government of Nigeria and that of the United Kingdom on legal services.”
The statement described Nigeria’s Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Doris Uzoka-Anite, as “unpatriotic” for giving the impression that the agreement would translate to “more money for Nigeria.”
The controversial agreement was signed on Tuesday by the UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Kemi Badenoch, alongside her counterpart and Nigerian Trade Minister, Doris Uzoka-Anite, in Abuja.
The agreement is anchored on the hopes that it would herald significant economic opportunities for both nations.