Saraki loses again, as CCT chairman refuses to disqualify self from corruption trial


The Code of Conduct Tribunal in Abuja on Thursday dismissed an application asking its chairman, Danladi Umar, to disqualify himself and withdraw from the trial of the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki.

Saraki is being prosecuted before the Umar-led CCT on 13 counts of false asset declaration which he allegedly made between 2003 and 2011‎ when he served as Kwara State Governor.

Saraki, had in his motion argued by his lawyer, Ajibola Oluyede, on Wednesday, asked Umar to disqualify himself on the grounds of likelihood of bias in the handling of the trial by Umar.

Oluyede argued that Umar would likely be subject to control by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on the basis that the anti-graft agency brought Saraki before the CCT for prosecution while it (EFCC) was still investigating the tribunal chairman for bribery.

Justice Danladi Umar of CCT
Justice Danladi Umar of CCT

But in the ruling of the two-man panel of the CCT on Thursday, Umar held that the application “lacked absolute merit‎”.

He upheld the opposition of the prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), to the motion, to the effect that contrary to Oluyede’s claim, the EFCC had cleared him of the bribery allegation.

He added that EFCC was already prosecuting the suspect that was found to be culpable in the allegation.

‎He said the EFCC had by its letter dated March 5, 2015, through its then chairman, Ibrahim Lamorde, to the ‎then Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke, cleared him of the alleged crime.

He said the March 5, 2015 letter in which the EFCC indicated that the allegation against him was a mere suspicion and that it did not constitute sufficient evidence to prosecute him, superseded the earlier investigation report issued by the anti-graft agency‎ on June 24, 2014

In the June 24, 201‎4 report, Adoke had endorsed on it, directing that Umar and his co-accused be prosecuted.

But Umar ruled on Thursday that the EFCC was not answerable to the AGF in its investigation and prosecution of cases, adding that “The AGF cannot prosecute without sufficient evidence from investigative agencies.”

He added that the incumbent AGF, Mr. Abubakar Malami, had said he (Umar) had been cleared while appearing before a House of Representatives’ committee which was petitioned with respect to the bribery allegation.

He recalled that Malami told the committee that he (the AGF) stood by the March 5, 2015‎ letter of EFCC to Adoke, indicating that there was no sufficient evidence to prosecute him (Umar).

He said, “The issue of having case to answer before the EFCC is over. The application lacks absolute merit and it is hereby dismissed in its entirety.”

The tribunal then directed the defence led on Thursday by Paul Usoro (SAN), to continue the cross-examination of the first prosecution witness, Michael Wetkas.

Follow Us


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.