Siminalayi Fubara, governor of Rivers, has described Peter Odili, ex-governor of the state, as someone with integrity.
On April 11, Odili publicly announced his support for Fubara and declared the governor the political leader of the state.
“Our people said I should tell you to stand with the president, align with his positive policies, and link the people of Rivers State with the centre,” Odili said.
“They have asked me to tell you that you are the political leader of Rivers State. Rivers people say, Wherever you go, they will go with you.”
In his speech at the inauguration of a healthcare facility in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni LGA, Odili’s hometown, Fubara said he was happy to have the support of the former governor.
Fubara said Odili’s backing has triggered “people’s high blood pressure,” adding that his detractors are now “restless, granting all sorts of media interviews.”
“I’ve said it before, and I’m saying it again. It doesn’t matter the number of people who stand with you. Even if you’re standing alone, no matter the side you’re standing on, provided you are standing on the right side, maintain your stand. We are happy to stand with him (Odili),” Fubara said.
“We are also happy that he is standing with us. Even his person alone is giving people high blood pressure. They are restless, granting all sorts of media interviews. Why are they doing it? It is because the people that matter, the people that have what they claimed they have; integrity, are with us. That is the truth.
“So, if we have one person who has integrity and character, is it not better than having 1,000 persons with questionable character? So, we are happy to identify with him.”
Since taking office in May 2023, Fubara has been locked in a struggle for control of Rivers political structure with Nyesom Wike, his successor and minister of the federal capital territory (FCT).
Earlier this month, Wike criticised some leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Rivers for lacking integrity and declaring support for Fubara.
He described them as “expired politicians” who are not worthy of being called “elder statesmen.”
